Abstract
In the 2019 Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill resistance movement, Hong Kong netizens used a popular digital platform known as LIHKG (連登) as a communicative center to exchange time-based information, express outrage or solidarity, and assemble decentered actions of agitation. There was an implied sense that LIHKG was facilitating a “wild” mode of politics oriented toward agitation, disturbance, and chaos. This paper examines its “wild politics” and asks: how might we trace the evolution of a complex political vernacular capable of creating a chaotic form of organizing, and what did this vocabulary tell us about the latent meanings, desires, and identity-making of the networked protesters? Utilizing the LDA topic-modelling method, we analyzed a large corpus of discussion threads on LIHKG to develop a customized domain-specific thematic repertoire, and revealed a “language in the wild” as part of a cultural archive that embodied the netizens’ ambivalent hopes. Copyright © 2022 The Author(s).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 349-375 |
| Journal | International Communication Gazette |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | Apr 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- LIHKG forum
- Anti-ELAB movement
- Digital activism
- LDA topic modelling
- Hong Kong
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Wild hopes: Sourcing the political vocabulary of digital citizenship from the LIHKG forum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS