When destiny hurts: Implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracism

Zhansheng CHEN, C. Nathan DEWALL, Kai Tak POON, Ee-Wen CHEN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current research investigates the role of implicit theories of relationships in modulating aggressive responses to ostracism. Three studies tested whether destiny beliefs (that potential relationships are either fundamentally compatible or not) predispose people to behave aggressively in the wake of ostracism. In Study 1, individual differences in destiny beliefs moderated the relationship between ostracism and aggressive affect. Two additional studies showed that manipulated destiny beliefs (vs. growth beliefs) caused ostracized participants to blast a provocateur with aversive noise (Study 2) and to give a destructive job candidate evaluation to a stranger (Study 3). These results highlight the significance of implicit theories in understanding risk factors for ostracism-related aggression. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1029-1036
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Citation

Chen, Z., DeWall, C. N., Poon, K.-T., & Chen, E.-W. (2012). When destiny hurts: Implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1029-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.002

Keywords

  • Implicit theories of relationships
  • Ostracism
  • Aggression
  • Destiny beliefs

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'When destiny hurts: Implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.