Validity of social, moral and emotional facets of self-description questionnaire II

Kim Chau Charles LEUNG, Herbert W. MARSH, Alexander Seeshing YEUNG, Adel S. ABDULJABBAR

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlespeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies adopting a construct validity approach can be categorized into within- and between-network studies. Few studies have applied between-network approach and tested the correlations of the social (same-sex relations, opposite-sex relations, parent relations), moral (honesty-trustworthiness), and emotional (emotional stability) facets of the Self-Description Questionnaire II with external criteria. Using a sample of high school students (n = 628), the authors examined the relations of these 5 nonacademic self-concept facets with nonacademic external criteria (between-network studies) besides examining the factor structure of these five facets of self-concept (within-network studies). Results provided strong support for the convergent validity in that each predicted correlation was statistically significant. Also, the discriminant validity of the 5 nonacademic subscales was clearly demonstrated by showing that each external criterion was more highly correlated with the predicted (matching) Self-Description Questionnaire II subscale than any of the Self-Description Questionnaire II subscales. Hence, these facets of self-concept are 5 distinct factors. Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
JournalThe Journal of Experimental Education
Volume83
Issue number1
Early online dateMar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Citation

Leung, K. C., Marsh, H. W., Yeung, A. S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Validity of social, moral and emotional facets of self-description questionnaire II. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(1), 1-23.

Keywords

  • SDQ II
  • Construct validity
  • External criteria
  • Nonacademic self-concept
  • Adolescent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of social, moral and emotional facets of self-description questionnaire II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.