Thinking styles and career decision-making self-efficacy among deaf or hard of hearing, and hearing students

Sanyin CHENG, Kuen Fung SIN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlespeer-review

Abstract

This study explores how students’ thinking styles are related to their career decision-making self-efficacy, by administering the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form to 484 deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) and 449 hearing university students in mainland China. Results show that, among all participants, those with Type I styles (i.e., more creativity-generating, less structured, and cognitively more complex) had higher levels of career decision-making self-efficacy, while those with Type II styles (i.e., more norm-favoring, more structured, and cognitively more simplistic) had lower levels. The contributions, limitations, and implications of the present research are discussed. Copyright © 2020 Taylor & Francis.
Original languageEnglish
JournalExceptionality
Early online date07 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 07 Dec 2020

Citation

Cheng, S., & Sin, K. F. (2020). Thinking styles and career decision-making self-efficacy among deaf or hard of hearing, and hearing students. Exceptionality. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09362835.2020.1850452

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking styles and career decision-making self-efficacy among deaf or hard of hearing, and hearing students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.