Abstract
Hong Kong and Singapore are both typical administrative states with an efficient administration and a vibrant market, which had achieved rapid economic growth in the past decades. This article examines the trajectory of their state capacity, highlighting recent problems and challenges. Based on a conceptual framework that captures and links up four dimensions - namely polity, bureaucracy, economy and civil society - their commonalities and differences in response are discussed. Their experience should be of particular relevance to transitional authoritarian states in Asia such as China, which faces similar challenges to reform in the arenas of politics, administration, economics and society. Copyright © 2008 Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-145 |
| Journal | The Pacific Review |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Administrative state
- State capacity
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
- Institutional
- Logic
- Re-institutionalization
- Strategic linkages
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The story of two administrative states: State capacity in Hong Kong and Singapore'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS