Abstract
This article reports literacy outcomes for a 2-year longitudinal student sample and a combined longitudinal and "in-mover" (i.e., those students who moved into the study schools between the initial pretest and the second-year posttest) sample, both of which were nested within 38 schools. Through the use of a cluster randomization design, schools were randomly assigned to implement Success for All or control methods. Hierarchical linear model analyses involving the longitudinal sample revealed statistically significant school-level effects of assignment to Success for All on three of the four literacy outcomes measured. Effects were as large as one quarter of a standard deviation—a learning advantage relative to controls exceeding half of a school year. Impacts for the combined longitudinal and in-mover sample were smaller in magnitude and more variable. The results correspond with the Success for All program theory, which targets school-level reform through multiyear sequencing of intensive literacy instruction. Copyright © 2005 by American Educational Research Association.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 673-696 |
Journal | American Educational Research Journal |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2005 |
Citation
Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A. C. K., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2005). The National randomized field trial of success for all: Second-year outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 673-696.Keywords
- Educational policy
- Experimental design
- School reform