Abstract
Previous research has shown similar mind perception for individuals with and without autism spectrum conditions (ASC). In the present study, we focused the comparison on 6- to 11-year old children versus their typically-developing (TD) counterparts, who were asked to make mental capacity (mind) judgments. Results showed comparable mind perception for the two participant groups, who perceived human entities as having the most mental capacities, followed by nonhuman animals, then by objects. The two groups similarly perceived human entities as having agentic and experiential capacities, objects as having little agentic or experiential capacities, and nonhuman animals as having experiential but not agentic capacities. The present study enriches the mind perception literature by including a clinical child sample with ASC into the analysis and discussion. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101087 |
| Journal | Cognitive Development |
| Volume | 59 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Mind perception
- Mind attribution
- Autism
- Anthropomorphism
- Dehumanization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The judgment of mind: A comparison between children with typical development and children with autism spectrum conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS