Abstract
This study examines how citizens attribute blame to government authorities for administrative errors made by artificial intelligence (AI) compared to human decision-makers. Based on blame attribution theory, we conducted a vignette-based survey experiment with 1,098 Chinese citizens, revealing that respondents assign less blame for errors caused by AI or AI-assisted decisions. Additionally, disclosing victims’ deservingness information heightened blame attribution. These findings contribute to the literature on administrative accountability, highlighting how citizens respond to AI-related errors and informing the growing use of AI in public sector decision-making. Copyright © 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Public Management Review |
Early online date | Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - Oct 2024 |
Citation
Tao, L., Wan, J., & Wen, B. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence and victims’ deservingness information on citizens’ blame attribution towards administrative errors. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2411632Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- Blame attribution patterns
- Administrative errors
- Victims’ deservingness information
- Administrative accountability