Test takers’ beliefs and experiences of a high-stakes computer-based English listening and speaking test

Ying ZHAN, Zhihong WAN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Test takers’ beliefs or experiences have been overlooked in most validation studies in language education. Meanwhile, a mutual exclusion has been observed in the literature, with little or no dialogue between validation studies and studies concerning the uses and consequences of testing. To help fill these research gaps, a group of Senior III students in Guangdong Province, mainland China, were interviewed concerning their views of the high-stakes Computer-based English Listening and Speaking Test (CELST) and their experiences of preparing for and taking the test. The data analysis indicated that the students had a distinct understanding of the CELST validity and also tentatively suggested a relationship between the students’ views of the CELST design, their test preparation practice and their test taking process. These findings provided information useful for sharpening a computer-based English listening and speaking test and for generating positive washback on English learning. Copyright © 2016 The Author(s).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-376
JournalRELC Journal
Volume47
Issue number3
Early online dateApr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Citation

Zhan, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2016). Test takers’ beliefs and experiences of a high-stakes computer-based English listening and speaking test. RELC Journal, 47(3), 363-376.

Keywords

  • Test taker perspectives
  • Washback
  • Test validity
  • High-stakes test
  • Computer-based English listening and speaking test

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Test takers’ beliefs and experiences of a high-stakes computer-based English listening and speaking test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.