'Synonymization' threat and the implications for the funding of school districts with relatively high populations of black students

Nicola A. ALEXANDER, Sung Tae JANG

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Education stakeholders have used descriptors of poverty and race as if they were synonymous. This 'synonymization' of identities is particularly evident for black and poor students. We define 'synonymization' as a policy threat that emerges when policymakers conflate two marginalized identities, resulting in policies that ostensibly, but not actually, address biased structures. From this construct, we posit two claims: (1) largely poor districts are not largely black districts and (2) dollars appropriated to largely poor districts are not equivalent to dollars appropriated to largely black districts. Our analysis supports those claims. We also found that higher correlations between portion poor and portion black do not lessen the negative impact of synonymization for the collective as one would have expected. While funding and poverty were significantly associated, there was no significant association between funding and portions of black students even when poverty and black student profile were significantly linked. Copyright © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-173
JournalRace Ethnicity and Education
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online dateSep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

funding
district
threat
poverty
school
dollar
student
stakeholder
education
Group

Bibliographical note

Alexander, N. A., & Jang, S. T. (2019). 'Synonymization' threat and the implications for the funding of school districts with relatively high populations of black students. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(2), 151-173. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2018.1511533

Keywords

  • Race
  • Poverty
  • School finance
  • 'synonymization'