School competition in Hong Kong: A battle of lifting school academic performance?

Research output: Contribution to conferencePapers

Abstract

This study investigates the validity of school competition in Hong Kong. It tests the relationships between student intake and school academic performance and school marketing practices. It also compares the pattern of the relationships between the Direct Subsidy Scheme (DSS) and aided secondary schools. Secondary data from 441 secondary schools were retrieved from a secondary school admission magazine and the schools’ websites. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that the school’s academic performance was positively related to discretionary student intake. Marketing school academic performance, but not marketing school features, was positively related to student intake. Lastly, marketing school academic performance intensified the relationship between the school’s academic performance and student intake in aided schools but not in DSS schools. Copyright © 2019 AERA.

Conference

Conference2019 Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association: Leveraging Education Research in a “Post-Truth” Era: Multimodal Narratives to Democratize Evidence
Abbreviated titleAERA 2019
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityToronto
Period05/04/1909/04/19
Internet address

Citation

Ho, C. S. M., & Lu, J. (2019, April). School competition in Hong Kong: A battle of lifting school academic performance? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2019 Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'School competition in Hong Kong: A battle of lifting school academic performance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.