Questioning the “citizenship industry”

Laurance Joseph SPLITTER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

Abstract

I argue that citizenship and related concepts should be treated warily by educators and researchers. Citizenship cannot define who I am, nor can it plausibly ground moral or values education. For both these tasks, the relational concept of being a person in the world does a better, and simpler, job. I suggest that classrooms which take the concept of personhood seriously should function as inquiring communities, in which such issues as the meaning and importance of our affiliations and associations may be critically examined. There may be good reasons for the recent expansion of what I term “the citizenship industry” in educational research, but they should not be taken for granted, particularly given that the concept of citizenship is often used by governments around the world to support strongly nationalistic policies which are inimical to genuine inquiry and autonomy. Copyright © 2011 Sowi-online.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-22
JournalJournal of Social Science Education
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Citation

Splitter, L. J. (2011). Questioning the “citizenship industry”. Journal of Social Science Education, 10(1), 12-22.

Keywords

  • Citizenship
  • Identity
  • Moral education
  • Personhood
  • Relationships
  • Community of inquiry
  • Values

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Questioning the “citizenship industry”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.