Learnable vs. unlearnable harmony patterns

Yee King Regine LAI

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study provides empirical evidence for Heinz’s (2010) Subregular Hypothesis, which predicts that some gaps found in the typology of phonotactic patterns are due to learnability—more specifically, that only phonotactic patterns with specific computational properties are humanly learnable. The study compares the learnability of two long-distance harmony patterns that differ typologically (attested vs. unattested) and computationally (Strictly Piecewise vs. Locally Testable) using the artificial-language-learning paradigm. The results reveal a general bias toward learning the attested, Strictly Piecewise pattern, exactly as the Subregular Hypothesis predicts. Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-451
JournalLinguistic Inquiry
Volume46
Issue number3
Early online dateJul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Citation

Lai, R. (2015). Learnable vs. unlearnable harmony patterns. Linguistic inquiry, 46(3), 425-451.

Keywords

  • Phonotactics
  • Learnability
  • Computational phonology
  • Formal theory
  • Typology
  • Dependencies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Learnable vs. unlearnable harmony patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.