Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How is reliability useful? Collaboration in social studies textbook research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Articles › peer-review

Abstract

Experience and subjectivity influence how texts are read, with reading involving “filling in the blanks”. This impacts the usefulness of intercoder reliability exercises in collaborative textbook analysis. Specifically, scholars’ individual backgrounds limit possibilities for substantive and meaningful intercoder reliability, particularly in international, cross-cultural, and multicultural settings. In this case, reliability is a problematic goal in textbook content analysis, possibly precluding substantive recognition of reader subjectivity—of researchers as well as students and teachers. In contrast, we argue that collaboration in textbook research can reveal the multifaceted nature of texts and generate multi-perspectival interpretations which are more meaningful in diverse contexts. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-252
JournalJournal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume19
Issue number53
Early online dateJan 2026
Publication statusPublished - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Reliability
  • Textbooks analyzes
  • Reading
  • Collaboration
  • Reader

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How is reliability useful? Collaboration in social studies textbook research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.