Abstract
Experience and subjectivity influence how texts are read, with reading involving “filling in the blanks”. This impacts the usefulness of intercoder reliability exercises in collaborative textbook analysis. Specifically, scholars’ individual backgrounds limit possibilities for substantive and meaningful intercoder reliability, particularly in international, cross-cultural, and multicultural settings. In this case, reliability is a problematic goal in textbook content analysis, possibly precluding substantive recognition of reader subjectivity—of researchers as well as students and teachers. In contrast, we argue that collaboration in textbook research can reveal the multifaceted nature of texts and generate multi-perspectival interpretations which are more meaningful in diverse contexts. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 241-252 |
| Journal | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 53 |
| Early online date | Jan 2026 |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Reliability
- Textbooks analyzes
- Reading
- Collaboration
- Reader
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How is reliability useful? Collaboration in social studies textbook research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS