Fostering rationality in Asian education

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapters

Abstract

Despite the apparent ample justification for teaching children to be rational, there is considerable controversy among philosophers over whether rationality is worth defending as a basic educational ideal. In this chapter, I first argue that, following Nicholas Rescher, rationality should be conceptualized as comprising cognitive, practical and evaluative rationality. Based on this tripartite conception of rationality, I then advance three arguments – founded on pragmatic, ontological and moral considerations – for rationality as a fundamental educational ideal. Finally, to promote the development of rationality in children, especially in Asia, I suggest that teachers should engage them in doing philosophy in the classroom. Copyright © 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSociological and philosophical perspectives on education in the Asia-Pacific region
EditorsChi-Ming LAM, Jae PARK
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherSpringer
Pages9-22
ISBN (Electronic)9789812879400
ISBN (Print)9789812879387
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Citation

Lam, C.-M. (2016). Fostering rationality in Asian education. In C.-M. Lam, & J. Park (Eds.), Sociological and philosophical perspectives on education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 9-22). Singapore: Springer.

Keywords

  • Coherence
  • Defend

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fostering rationality in Asian education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.