Abstract
Despite the apparent ample justification for teaching children to be rational, there is considerable controversy among philosophers over whether rationality is worth defending as a basic educational ideal. In this chapter, I first argue that, following Nicholas Rescher, rationality should be conceptualized as comprising cognitive, practical and evaluative rationality. Based on this tripartite conception of rationality, I then advance three arguments – founded on pragmatic, ontological and moral considerations – for rationality as a fundamental educational ideal. Finally, to promote the development of rationality in children, especially in Asia, I suggest that teachers should engage them in doing philosophy in the classroom. Copyright © 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Sociological and philosophical perspectives on education in the Asia-Pacific region |
Editors | Chi-Ming LAM, Jae PARK |
Place of Publication | Singapore |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 9-22 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9789812879400 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789812879387 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Citation
Lam, C.-M. (2016). Fostering rationality in Asian education. In C.-M. Lam, & J. Park (Eds.), Sociological and philosophical perspectives on education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 9-22). Singapore: Springer.Keywords
- Coherence
- Defend