False belief, complementation language, and contextual bias in preschoolers

Lisa NG, Him CHEUNG, Wen XIAO

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present study, we address two questions concerning the relation between children's false belief and their understanding of complex object complements. The first question is whether the previously demonstrated association between tensed complements and false belief generalizes to infinitival complements (de Villiers & Pyers, 2002). The second question is whether the relation is altered by the perceptual saliency of test objects (i.e., reality pull) and expressed desire of story characters (i.e., desire pull) as extraneous contextual factors. In Study 1, unexpectedly, we showed in a group of 4-year-olds that false belief correlated with comprehension of infinitival but not tensed complements. In Studies 2 and 3 it was found that a significant part of the association was explainable by a reality/desire pull built into the test context. We conclude that the relation between false belief and complementation is context-sensitive. The perceptual saliency of certain test objects and desire of story characters may in some situations bias the child towards attending more to the commonality between false belief and complement understanding, which enhances their association. Copyright © 2010 The Author(s).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-179
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Language
trend
language
comprehension
Group

Citation

Ng, L., Cheung, H., & Xiao, W. (2010). False belief, complementation language, and contextual bias in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(2), 168-179. doi: 10.1177/0165025409350954

Keywords

  • Complements
  • False belief
  • Reality/desire pull
  • Theory of mind