Exploring whole school versus subject department improvement in Hong Kong secondary schools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on school improvement tends to assume that school improvement is a school-wide process. Nonetheless, some researchers have also proposed that secondary schools are comprised of subcultures centered on subject area departments. It has further been suggested that variations in the sociocultural organization of subject departments could produce differential results in the learning outcomes of students. To date, however, few empirical studies have examined the leverage offered by this perspective. The current study addresses this gap in the literature by analyzing changes in the learning outcomes of subject departments over a 3-year period as compared with patterns of whole school improvement in 47 Hong Kong secondary schools. The results support the proposition that theory, research, and practice on secondary schools will benefit from viewing their improvement from a perspective that takes into account the diversity of department-level conditions and learning outcomes. Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-239
JournalSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement
Volume26
Issue number2
Early online dateFeb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Citation

Ko, J., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2014). Exploring whole school versus subject department improvement in Hong Kong secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), 215-239.

Keywords

  • School improvement
  • Education reform
  • Secondary schools
  • Hong Kong
  • Change
  • Subject departments

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring whole school versus subject department improvement in Hong Kong secondary schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.