Exploring the process of evaluative judgement: The case of engineering students judging intercultural competence

Jiahui Jess LUO, Cecilia Ka Yuk CHAN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlespeer-review

Abstract

For students to sustain their learning beyond higher education, it is important for them to develop their evaluative judgement. Although the importance of evaluative judgement is well-established, the process through which students make such judgements remains contested. This study explores students’ evaluative judgement process by asking 20 engineering students to evaluate their own intercultural competence and that of other engineers in task-based interviews. The findings reveal that in the process of judgement-making, students negotiate and navigate multiple dimensions, including their ‘knowledge of intercultural competence’, ‘awareness of bias’, ‘attitude towards development’, ‘capability to judge’, ‘action towards improvement’ and ‘identity as assessor’. Building on these findings, the study further reconceptualises evaluative judgement as a negotiated process rather than a capability. Copyright © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)951-965
JournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume48
Issue number7
Early online dateDec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Citation

Luo, J., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). Exploring the process of evaluative judgement: The case of engineering students judging intercultural competence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(7), 951-965. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2155611

Keywords

  • Evaluative judgement
  • Intercultural competence
  • Self assessment
  • Peer assessment
  • Judgement process

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the process of evaluative judgement: The case of engineering students judging intercultural competence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.