Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition

Neville CLEMENT, Terence LOVAT, Allyson HOLBROOK, Margaret KILEY, Sid BOURKE, Brian PALTRIDGE, Sue STARFIELD, Hedy FAIRBAIRN, Dennis Michael MCINERNEY

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapters

Abstract

Evaluation of research is a core function of academic work, yet there has been very little theoretical development about what it means to ‘know’ in relation to judgements made in examination of doctoral research. This chapter addresses the issue by reflecting on findings from three projects aimed at enhancing understanding of doctoral examination. In order to progress understanding about knowledge judgements in the doctoral research context, the chapter draws on two key contributions in the field of knowledge and knowing, namely, Habermas’ cognitive interests and Chinn, Buckland and Samarapungavan’s notion of epistemic cognition. It examines the common ground between the two bodies of theory, drawing illustratively on empirical work in the field of doctoral examination. The comparison of the Habermasian theory of cognitive interests with Chinn et al.’s notion of epistemic cognition led to the conclusion that there were areas of overlap between the two conceptual schemas that could be utilised to advance research into doctoral examination in higher education. Habermas’ cognitive interests (which underpin his ways of knowing theory) offer a conceptual lens that facilitates analysis of the interaction of ontological and epistemic components of knowledge production. Chinn et al.’s notion of epistemic cognition allows for finer grained analysis of aspects of the cognitive work involved in knowledge rendition. This work is particularly pertinent in an era that sees the boundaries of the disciplines being challenged by the need for new perspectives and cross-disciplinary approaches to solving complex problems. Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheory and method in higher education research
EditorsJeroen HUISMAN, Malcolm TIGHT
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Limited
Pages213-233
ISBN (Electronic)9781785602863
ISBN (Print)9781785602870
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Citation

Clement, N., Lovat, T., Holbrook, A., Kiley, M., Bourke, S., Paltridge, B., et al. (2015). Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 213-233). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.