Evaluation methods for portfolio management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlespeer-review

Abstract

We distinguish the evaluation methods for two main kinds of investment strategies, namely, passive and active portfolio management. Passive portfolio management aims at tracking an underlying index as close as possible with the most important measure being the tracking error. To claim the tracking error not exceeding a certain threshold, we apply the concept of noninferiority test as opposed to the common malpractice of one‐sided test, which tries to accept the null hypothesis when there is insufficient evidence to reject it. In contrast, the normal one‐sided test should be adopted in active portfolio management, which requires another crucial statistic, the information ratio, of an active portfolio to exceed the underlying benchmark in a risk adjusted sense. The asymptotic variances of the tracking error and the difference between two information ratios are derived, which allow proper evaluation and comparison of strategies within the passive and active portfolio management frameworks. Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Early online dateApr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Apr 2020

Citation

Law, K. K. F., Li, W. K., & Yu, P. L. H. (2020). Evaluation methods for portfolio management. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/asmb.2535

Keywords

  • Asymptotic analysis
  • Equivalence testing
  • Information ratio
  • Passive vs active portfolio management
  • Tracking error

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation methods for portfolio management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.