Esoteric Confucianism, moral dilemmas, and filial piety

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

Abstract

Two controversial cases in Confucian literature present the demands of filial piety as conflicting with those of impartial justice. Let us call them the Case of Concealment (Analects 18.13) and the Case of Evasion (Mencius 7A53). A dogmatic reading of the texts indicates that both Confucius and Mencius give more weight to filial piety than to justice. This essay, however, provides an alternative reading of the cases: the liberal reading . I argue that the Confucian teachers used the cases as moral dilemmas that force Confucian students to learn how to use a cluster of Confucian virtues, including practical wisdom, discretion, and straight determination, under difficult circumstances. The liberal reading views these moral dilemmas as rhetorical tools; they guide Confucian students in meditative exercises and ultimately transform students’ mode of seeing and being. Copyright © 2020 Metaphilosophy LLC and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-225
JournalMetaphilosophy
Volume51
Issue number2-3
Early online date27 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Citation

Sin, W. (2020). Esoteric Confucianism, moral dilemmas, and filial piety. Metaphilosophy, 51(2-3), 206-225. doi: 10.1111/meta.12418

Keywords

  • Confucianism
  • Esotericism
  • Filial piety
  • Pierre Hadot
  • Leo Strauss
  • Moral dilemmas

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Esoteric Confucianism, moral dilemmas, and filial piety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.