Designing automated assessment for collaborative argumentation in science classroom

Wenli CHEN, Chee Kit LOOI, Wenting XIE, Yun WEN

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapters

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the realm of CSCL research, collaborative argumentation is regarded as a key type of knowledge construction process that should be mastered by students to enable knowledge advancement. We designed an automated assessment system to support students’ collaborative argumentation in Science learning. This paper describes the system design and explores how it was used by teachers and students in Singapore classrooms from a pilot study. Copyright © 2015 ISLS.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExploring the material conditions of learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2015
EditorsOskar LINDWALL, Paivi HAKKINEN, Timothy KOSCHMANN, Pierre TCHOUNIKINE, Sten LUDVIGSEN
Place of PublicationGothenburg, Sweden
PublisherInternational Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)
Pages533-538
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9780990355076
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Citation

Chen, W., Looi, C. K., Xie, W., & Wen, Y. (2015). Designing automated assessment for collaborative argumentation in science classroom. In O. Lindwall, P. Hakkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2015 (Vol. 2, pp. 533-538). Gothenburg, Sweden: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Designing automated assessment for collaborative argumentation in science classroom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.