Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coverage versus supply cost in facility location: Physics of frustrated spin systems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlespeer-review

Abstract

A comprehensive coverage is crucial for communication, supply, and transportation networks, yet it is limited by the requirement of extensive infrastructure and heavy energy consumption. Here, we draw an analogy between spins in antiferromagnet and outlets in supply networks, and apply techniques from the studies of disordered systems to elucidate the effects of balancing the coverage and supply costs on the network behavior. A readily applicable, coverage optimization algorithm is derived. Simulation results show that magnetized and antiferromagnetic domains emerge and coexist to balance the need for coverage and energy saving. The scaling of parameters with system size agrees with the continuum approximation in two dimensions and the tree approximation in random graphs. Due to frustration caused by the competition between coverage and supply cost, a transition between easy and hard computation regimes is observed. We further suggest a local expansion approach to greatly simplify the message updates which shed light on simplifications in other problems. Copyright © 2014 American Physical Society.
Original languageEnglish
Article number062805
JournalPhysical Review E
Volume89
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coverage versus supply cost in facility location: Physics of frustrated spin systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.