Corporate social performance, firm valuation, and industrial difference: Evidence from Hong Kong

Yan Leung Stephen CHEUNG, Kun JIANG, Billy S. C. MAK, Weiqiang TAN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study addresses two issues. First, does corporate social performance matter in Hong Kong. Second, if yes, is it relevant to some industries more than others. To answer these questions, we develop a corporate social performance index (CSP) to measure the quality of corporate social performance of major Hong Kong listed firms. The criteria are based on the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Using the 3-year period from 2002 to 2005, we find that firm valuation is positive and significantly associated with CSP. Interestingly, this relation matters less in China related firms and firms with a concentrated ownership structure. The results also show that CSP impacts firm valuation more positively when the firm is in the service sector. We further find that CSP is positively related to the market valuation of the subsequent year. Copyright © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-631
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume114
Issue number4
Early online dateApr 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Citation

Cheung, Y.-L., Jiang, K., Mak, B. S. C., & Tan, W. (2013). Corporate social performance, firm valuation, and industrial difference: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(4), 625-631.

Keywords

  • Hong Kong market
  • Corporate social performance
  • Firm valuation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate social performance, firm valuation, and industrial difference: Evidence from Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.