Abstract
COVID-19 is the greatest challenge the world has faced since World War II. By investigating two case countries—China and India, this study explains the variance based on the theory of the ‘social construction of risk’ concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. Does an individual country’s culture, style of governance, construction of risk, and communication affect the management of COVID-19? Findings reveal that the variations of risk construction and communication of narratives play a pivotal role in building the public perception of crisis. Cultural homogeneity and collectivism, the constitutional setting for policymaking risk narratives and communication, are crucial determinants of effective crisis management, and many states lacking these factors suffer profound difficulties. Regarding these, China is more successful than India in creating the social construction of the risk of COVID-19 crisis narratives. The policy implication of this study helps the government find a better approach to persuade its citizens to comply with the public health policy in case of an emergency. Copyright © 2023 Association of Asia Scholars.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Millennial Asia |
Early online date | Jul 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - Jul 2023 |
Citation
Hossain, M. F., Shi, Y., & Jahan, M. (2023). Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic crisis narratives and social construction of risk: Comparative case studies of China and India. Millennial Asia. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231174268Keywords
- Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
- Crisis narratives
- Social construction of risk
- Public policy
- China
- India
- PG student publication