Abstract
In many parts of the world, central training agencies have played an important role in formulating training policies. However, due to public management reforms, training in the public sector has been customized and effectiveness emphasized. The drivers for such changes can generally be categorized into individual and institutional levels. Trainers and trainees, as opposite ends of the training programme, should normatively hold different views on these drivers. Trainers, being on the supplier side, should be influenced more by institutional-level drivers; trainees, as recipients, should be affected mainly by individual-level drivers. However, our empirical evidence on training in Hong Kong’s public sector reveals that trainees care about both drivers while trainers are strangely indifferent to both. Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 149-177 |
| Journal | Journal of Asian Public Policy |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | Mar 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Civil service training
- Customization
- Effectiveness
- Public sector reform
- Institutional
- Individual
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Convergence or divergence? Trainees’ and trainers’ perceptions of the customization and effectiveness of public service training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS