Abstract
The study evaluated the construct validity of the Chinese Hong Kong version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). Three hundred and thirty four patients with a broad range of upper extremity disorders were recruited into the study. Each completed DASH-HKPWH and SF-36 forms and their pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale) and grip strength were also measured. The mean DASH-HKPWH score was 40 (SD=20). Principal component factor analysis identified a single factor, which accounted for 47% of the total variance. Pearson correlation was applied to assess convergent and divergent validity of the DASH-HKPWH by comparison with the above-mentioned subjective and objective measurements. Our findings were comparable to the DASH of other languages. Copyright © 2005 by The British Society for Surgery of the Hand.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 29-34 |
Journal | Journal of Hand Surgery |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2005 |
Citation
Lee, E. W. C., Chung, M. M. H., Li, A. P. S., & Lo, S. K. (2005). Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). Journal of Hand Surgery, 30(1), 29-34. doi: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2004.09.010Keywords
- DASH questionnaire
- Construct validity
- Outcome measure
- Upper extremity disorders
- SF-36