Abstract
Objectives: Although clinical data have shown that the BNT162b2 vaccine, which is widely used in many countries, is safe and effective as a protection against the SARS-CoV-2 infection, extant research in adverse reactions using real-world data of various sociodemographic characteristics is scant.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study to compare age differences in self-reported reactogenicity of BNT162b2 in Hong Kong. A total of 1,516 participants were intensively followed up for two weeks following both doses of BNT162b2 vaccination, during which their basic demographic, health conditions, and medication information were collected.
Results: Results from the generalized mixed model showed that compared with adults aged 18 to 59 years, older adults aged 60 years or above had a lower risk of adverse reactions and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years had a moderately higher risk.
Conclusions: Results of this study should be informative to parents considering BNT162b2 vaccination for their children in that moderately increased reactogenicity compared with adults is anticipated. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 47-50 |
Journal | International Journal of Infectious Diseases |
Volume | 116 |
Early online date | Dec 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2022 |
Citation
Chan, E. W. W., Leung, M. T. Y., Lau, L. K. W., Leung, J., Lum, D., Wong, R. S.-M., Li, X., Chui, C. S. L., Wan, E. Y. F., Wong, C. K. H., Chan, E. W. Y., Ip, P., Wong, I. C. K., & Lai, F. T. T. (2022). Comparing self-reported reactogenicity between adolescents and adults following the use of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine: A prospective cohort study. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 116, 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.354Keywords
- COVID-19
- Vaccine safety
- Pharmacovigilance
- Epidemiology
- Pediatrics