Abstract
In this paper, I analyze epistemic blameworthiness. After presenting Michael Bergmann’s definition of epistemic blameworthiness, I argue that his definition is problematic because it does not have a control condition. I conclude by offering an improved definition of epistemic blameworthiness and defending this definition against potential counterexamples. Copyright © 2014 Philosophy Documentation Center. All Rights Reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 7-17 |
| Journal | Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal |
| Volume | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2014 |