Argumentative writing at the tertiary level: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of a hybrid approach

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapters

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This qualitative study explores pedagogical approaches to teaching argumentative writing in a first-year undergraduate EAP course at an English-medium instruction (EMI) university in Hong Kong. 16 undergraduate freshmen students were interviewed in the study. The findings indicate that the adoption of a hybrid approach over a traditional teacher-led class assisted students in developing an understanding of argument and the concept of argumentation. Our study suggests that integrating several input methods (videos, quizzes, reflections, peer review, face-to-face instruction) provided multiple explanations that helped develop students' argumentative writing skills. Copyright © 2021 by the University of Michigan.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArgumentative writing in a second language: Perspectives on research and pedagogy
EditorsAlan R. HIRVELA, Diane D. BELCHER
Place of PublicationAnn Arbor
PublisherUniversity of Michigan Press
Pages223-239
ISBN (Electronic)9780472129478
ISBN (Print)9780472038671
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Citation

Kohnke, L., & Har, F. (2021). Argumentative writing at the tertiary level: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of a hybrid approach. In A. R. Hirvela & D. D. Belcher (Eds.), Argumentative writing in a second language: Perspectives on research and pedagogy (pp. 223-239). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Argumentative writing at the tertiary level: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of a hybrid approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.