The study was based on an activity that got teachers to reflect on their views of the nature of science. It is important for science educators to explore teachers’ image of science because it may have profound implications on the way teachers present and teach science in the classroom (Nott and Wellington, 1993). The activity involved teachers in two tasks, the first task required teachers to rate 24 items, each ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The use of a scoring system in four continua: (a) relativism / positivism; (b) inductivism / deductivism; (c) contexualism / decontexutalism; (d) Process / content; (e) instrumentalism / realism helped to work out the profile of teachers’ nature of science. The second task required teachers to write about their views of science, science teaching and science learning. About forty teachers participating in an in-service teacher education workshop were invited to the activity. The differences of teachers’ scores in the first task before and after the workshop were of captured to identify the evidence of professional development. Teachers’ responses in their view of science, science teaching and science learning provide further justification to teachers’ profile of the nature of science.
|Publication status||Published - 1999|
|Event||International Conference on Teacher Education 1999: Teaching Effectiveness and Teacher Development in the New Century = 教師教育國際學術會議：新世紀的教學效能及教師發展 - The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong|
Duration: 22 Feb 1999 → 24 Feb 1999
|Conference||International Conference on Teacher Education 1999: Teaching Effectiveness and Teacher Development in the New Century = 教師教育國際學術會議：新世紀的教學效能及教師發展|
|Abbreviated title||ICTED 1999|
|Period||22/02/99 → 24/02/99|