A critical evaluation of the understanding of critical thinking by school teachers: The case of Hong Kong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticles

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a strong belief that critical thinking should be cultivated in schools. But it is not clear how critical thinking is understood by front-line teachers who are given the responsibility of training critical thinkers. Based on a study conducted in Hong Kong, we found that some school teachers were in favor of a “positive” image of critical thinker who is knowledgeable, prudent, being critical to the critics who are ready to criticize, and being constructive after making criticisms. We try to argue that such a positive portrayal, although uncontroversial from a detached point of view, may not be adequate in the context of Hong Kong where a critical stance toward power holders and established interests is badly needed. Without paying due attention to the “aporetic” dimension, such understanding of critical thinking would make it difficult for students to adopt a critical stance to the prevailing cultural beliefs, social values, political institutions, or economic ideologies that merit the greatest attention. Copyright © 2016 The Author(s).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-44
JournalCitizenship, Social and Economics Education
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Citation

Mok, F. K. T., & Yuen, T. W. W. (2016). A critical evaluation of the understanding of critical thinking by school teachers: The case of Hong Kong. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 15(1), 28-44.

Keywords

  • Critical thinking
  • Aporetic dimension
  • Context sensitivity
  • Hong Kong

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A critical evaluation of the understanding of critical thinking by school teachers: The case of Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.