試論歷代文評對唐宋古文運動的整合

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlespeer-review

Abstract

自明代茅坤《唐宋八大家文鈔》始,評論唐宋古文多以“八大家”為代表,唐、宋古文運動合稱也成了約定俗成的慣例。其實,“八大家”稱謂的形成,乃至把唐、宋古文運動合而論之,都有其發展過程。透過比較歷代文評中對於唐、宋古文運動的論述,本文指出:一、北宋歐、蘇等古文大家有意識地把自身的文章,黏合到中唐古文運動的“文統”之中,促使了唐、宋古文運動“整合”的發生;二、自南宋始,把“韓、柳、歐、蘇”視為唐、宋古文四大家之說已幾成定論;並且透過宋、元、明三朝的演化,終於形成了“八家共名”的共識;三、愈到後代,人們愈不重視韓、歐等關於“文以載道”的主張,而更趨向把“古文運動”視為一次成功的“文學”運動。
Since the demonstration by Mao Kun’s 茅坤Tang Song ba dajia wenchao唐宋八大家文鈔,critics mostly use the specific term —“The Eight Great Writers of Tang and Song”(ba dajia 八大家) to comment on the classical prose of Tang and Song dynasties;and the combined statement of “Classical Prose Movement of Tang and Song dynasties” (Tang Song guwen yundong 唐宋古文運動) is widely accepted by the contemporaries. In fact, the formation of the title of “The Eight Great Writers of Tang and Song”and the combination of discussion on Tang and Song’s classical prose movement experience a detailed clarification. This paper, through the comparative study of the traditional criticisms on the Classical Prose Movement of Tang and Song dynasties, states that (1) Classical prose writers, such as Ouyang Xiu 歐陽修 and Su Shi 蘇軾, intend to use their prose writing linking with “the unification of literature” (wentong 文統) of Classical Prose Movement of mid-Tang dynasty which is enhancing the configuration of Classical Prose Movement of Tang and Song dynasties. (2) Since Southern Song dynasty, Critics acknowledge that “Han Yu 韓愈, Liu Zhongyuan 柳宗元, Ouyang Xiu 歐陽修 and Su Shi 蘇軾” are the four masters of the classical prose of Tang and Song dynasties; in addition to the development of classical prose criticisms of Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties, the title of “The Eight Great Writers of Tang and Song” has canonized by the literary circle. (3) After the configuration of “Eight Great Writers”, literati do not concentrate on the evaluation on the doctrine of “literature as a vehicle to convey the way” (Wen yi zai dao 文以載道) by Han Yu and Ouyang Xiu, but mainly shift to the clarification of Classical Prose Movement as a successful movement of “literature”. Copyright © 2005 人文中國學報.
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)577-601
Journal人文中國學報
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005

Citation

馮志弘(2005):試論歷代文評對唐宋古文運動的整合,《人文中國學報》,11,頁577-601。

Keywords

  • Alt. title: An interpretation of the traditional criticisms on the configuration of classical prose movement of Tang and Song dynasties