評丘為君《戴震學的形成》

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

本文主要針對丘為君教授所撰寫的《戴震學的形成》所未討論到的三個重點,提出補充。第一點是十八世紀以考據學為中心的知識論述的若干複雜性;第二點指出晚清學者劉師培早已注意到戴震的重要性,對於戴震思想有所發揮,甚至影響了章太炎。因此論戴震學的形成,不能不討論劉師培。第三點是日本學者研究戴震時,不但早已注意到劉師培的重要性,也提出了若干中國學者未嘗注意的觀點,值得學者參究。
This is a review as well as a supplementary note on Daizhenxue De Xingcheng by Professor Qiu Wei-jun, and three topics which were ignored by this book are discussed. First, the complexity of the “kaozhengxue” scholarship in the 18th century China is clarified before we discuss how the characteristic of Dai Zhen’s scholarship had an unusual impact on the scholars of the late 19th century. Second, when we talk about the beginning of the “Daizhenxue” (the study of Dai Zhen’s scholarship), Liu Shi-pei is a critical person that should be mentioned. Japanese scholar Professor Kawata Teiichi of Kansai University discussed the case of Liu in his research paper. Third, other Japanese scholars also suggested interesting and inspiring points of view in analyzing the spirit of Dai’s scholarship and the position of Dai in the intellectual history of the late imperial China. Copyright © 2005 國立臺灣師範大學國際與社會科學學院.
Original languageChinese
Pages (from-to)197-213
Journal臺灣東亞文明研究學刊
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Citation

鄭吉雄(2005):評丘為君《戴震學的形成》,《臺灣東亞文明研究學刊》,2(1),頁197-213。

Keywords

  • 戴震
  • 劉師培
  • 章太炎
  • 乾嘉
  • 考證學
  • Dai Zhen
  • Liu Shi-pei
  • Zhang Taiyan
  • Qianjia
  • Kaozhengxue
  • Alt. title: Review on Qiu Weijun’s Daizhenxue De Xingcheng