Abstract
本文實證檢驗了流動性與盈餘慣性現象之間的關係。首先,壞消息具有更差的流動性,表明壞消息(低標準化未預期盈餘(SUE))的股票比好消息股票(高SUE)具有更大的不確定性,處於更高成本的資訊環境中。其次,盈餘慣性收益可以部分地解釋為流動性補償,換而言之,具有好消息的股票比壞消息股票對流動性更敏感。本文採用了CAPM以及Fama-French三因素方法,發現投資者並沒有對盈餘公告資訊作出及時和準確的反應,這在某種程度上表明,投資者對盈餘預期的高估在於採用了不恰當的定價模型。當流動性作為風險因素引入定價模型時,投資者的行為在某種程度上可以得到更好的解釋。
This paper investigates the relation between the post-earning-announcement drift anomaly and liquidity. First, I find that on average, bad-news firms (low standardized unexpected earnings, SUE) are less liquid than good-news firms (high SUE), which indicates that bad-news firms are subject to a more uncertain and costly information environment. Second, I find that PEAD can be partially interpreted as compensation for liquidity. Prior studies find that CAPM and Fama-French benchmark pricing model fail to adjust the risk premium. But when a liquidity factor is introduced into the pricing model, investors’ behavior could be better explained to some extent. Copyright © 2008 深圳證券交易所.
This paper investigates the relation between the post-earning-announcement drift anomaly and liquidity. First, I find that on average, bad-news firms (low standardized unexpected earnings, SUE) are less liquid than good-news firms (high SUE), which indicates that bad-news firms are subject to a more uncertain and costly information environment. Second, I find that PEAD can be partially interpreted as compensation for liquidity. Prior studies find that CAPM and Fama-French benchmark pricing model fail to adjust the risk premium. But when a liquidity factor is introduced into the pricing model, investors’ behavior could be better explained to some extent. Copyright © 2008 深圳證券交易所.
Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 30-37 |
Journal | 證券市場導報 |
Volume | 2008 |
Issue number | 9 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Citation
譚偉強(2008):流動性與盈餘公告後價格漂移研究,《證券市場導報》,2008(9),頁30-37。Keywords
- 流動性
- 盈餘公告後漂移(PEAD)
- 市場效率
- Liquidity
- Post-earnings-announcement drift
- Market efficiency
- Alt. title: Post-earning-announcement drift anomaly and liquidity: Empirical evidence from Chinese stock market