《周易集解》所引王弼注與《周易正義》互異考

唐孔穎達取王弼與韓康伯所注而為《周易正義》(下稱《正義》)，官修背景使王弼義理《易》學定於一尊，兩漢象數《易》漸見廢棄。面對「專崇王注，而眾說皆廢」之局面，李鼎祚匯前代三十餘家注而成《周易集解》，力圖恢復象數《易》學之地立。《集解》雖以象數為重，卻亦收入王弼對《周易》卦爻辭之說解，以示象數與義理皆不宜偏廢。惟以二本相較，《集解》所見王注無論在注文位置、詳略及思想內容方面皆與《正義》有別。本文從「集解」之體例及王弼注《易》之思想特點分析，並取敦煌《周易王弼注》寫卷及《群書治要》所引王弼《易》注為較，指出《集解》王注與《正義》相異之處，當出李鼎祚所改。從《集解》刪改注文之舉，可得見李鼎祚對王弼《易》學之評價。此外，兩漢《易》說早亡，賴《周易集解》所輯方得以傳世，惟《集解》既有刪改注文之例，則李氏所輯是否能反映漢《易》原貌，實當進一步思考。
Wang Bi is regarded as the representative of the Moral Principle School in Zhou Yi's study. His commentary, named Zhou Yi Zhu, has become the official version since Kong Ying Da in the Tang Dynasty complied the Wu Jing Zhen Yi which used Wang Bi's work as an authoritative commentary on Zhou Yi. At the meanwhile, Li Ding Zuo edited the commentaries by Han and post-Han scholars to Zhou Yi Ji Jie in order to emphasize the importance of the Images and Numbers approach. Wang Bi's work was also included in Li's book. However, Wang's commentary quoted by Li Ding Zuo is quite different from that of Zhou Yi Zheng Yi. This paper categorizes the difference of the same text shown in two books. By making comparison with the quotations of Zhou Yi Zhu from such sources as the Dunghuang manuscript and the Qun Shu Zhi Yao, this paper tries to prove that Li Ding Zuo did modify the commentaries in his edition. Copyright © 2014 蘭臺出版社.