何謂反腐敗的成功？：理論與實踐

雖然學界關於腐敗的研究已經非常豐富，但是很少有研究深入地探討什麼是成功的反腐敗。本文首先區別了反腐敗成效與反腐敗措施之間的差別。反腐敗成效指的是反腐敗改革的產出或者結果，而反腐敗措施則是指反腐敗的投入。區別這兩個概念的意義在於：雖然反腐敗措施可能存在非常大的差異，但是如何定義反腐敗成功卻有著大致共通的標準。我們認為，反腐敗有其邏輯規則，必須做到多維度的治理、全方位的參與以及深層次的預防，只有在這三方面達標的腐敗治理才堪稱成功。我們的分析主要基於中國香港特別行政區的經驗，通過以上所述的“三維”框架探討成功反腐的關鍵因素。
Despite rich literature in corruption studies, there is scant indepth research on what anti-corruption success means. This article first distinguishes two concepts: anti-corruption effectiveness and anti-corruption measures. The former refers to the output of anti-corruption reform, while the latter concerns the input. It is important to make this distinction because although anti-corruption measures vary considerably, the criteria to gauge the success in controlling corruption are roughly same. We argue that corruption control has its own logic and should pay attention to multi-dimensional governance, civic engagement, and socially-embedded prevention. Only by meeting these three standards, can anti-corruption reform be considered successful. Our analysis draws on the experience of Hong Kong SAR and we adopt the three-dimensional framework outlined above to explore the key elements of anti-corruption success. Copyright © 2018 SSAP.